The comparison in the preceding table is done on the basis of the

following properties that are vital for any organization to select one

Blockchain over other, which are the type of DLT, consensus

mechanism, scalability and finality, L2 technology if any, market

adoption/number of projects, transaction fees, smart contract

language, and market capitalization.

Considering all the aspects. Solana and Algorand seem to be

ahead of the others.

12.2 Comparison of Interoperable Blockchains –

Polkadot vs Cosmos vs Polygon

The interoperable Blockchains are compared on the basis of the time

of the launch, language for the smart contract (for considering

development or learning efforts), limitations, number of live projects

(as of November 2021), quality of documentation, transaction fees

(as of November 2021), market capitalization, and the price of one

cryptocurrency against USD (as of November 2021). Please find

their comparison in Table 12.2, as follows:

Note: All the three interoperable blockchains, i.e., Polygon, Cosmos,

and Polkadot are open source protocols.

Table 12.2: Comparison of public interoprrable Blockchains

Among all interoperable Blockchains, Polygon (earlier Matic

network) seems to win the race.